推荐同事 机构合作 中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español




登录 注册 新注册优惠

How to deal with run-on sentences 文章中如何避免使用连写句

What is a run-on sentence? In short, a run on sentence is a poorly constructed sentence that either ignores some rules of grammar or tries to connect too many ideas into a single sentence.


This sentence is an example of a poorly written run-on sentence, it lacks a connecting word.

It should be written like this:


This sentence is an example that is not a run-on sentence, because it has a connecting word.

Run-on sentences do not have to be long. They simply are not well developed. Other run-on sentences simply connect too many ideas into a single sentence. Such sentences are easy to find in the scientific literature.


Why are run-on sentences a problem? As noted above, run-on sentences either have poor grammar or try to present too many ideas. The reader becomes lost and cannot remember the ideas being presented. When many ideas are patched together into one long sentence, this can confuse the reader. The reader has to sort out many different ideas lumped together as a single sentence.


Before we criticize writers for making long sentences, let’s discuss what makes a good long sentence. Writers are often taught that long sentences make better writing than short sentences.


I will provide some examples. I will make those examples as I write. These sentences are an example. My writing style is short and choppy. The example uses italics. They are also indented like this sentence so they stand out from the other text.

In that in the example above, I have used a series of short and choppy sentences to propose several ideas. Now, how can those ideas be constructed into a good, easily readable sentence.


Here I provide a second example, again using italics and inset text that combines the same ideas into one longer sentence; this sample sentence is no longer choppy.

In the last example, above, I had tried to show you a method that can be used to make good, long sentences. I have used a semicolon to make a longer sentence. Semicolons are used to combine to complete ideas (two complete sentences) into one long, but grammatically correct, sentence.


Conjunctions are also used to make longer sentences by connecting two different ideas with words such as “and, or, for, but, so, however.” Scientific papers also use adverbs to connect ideas, such as “therefore, however, thus.” Rather than concentrate on grammar, I’d rather talk about how these words are used and mis-used to make long sentences. Before we go farther, let’s take a look at an actual run-on sentence; some of the sample sentences below have been modified to disguise the writer and topic, but came from recently edited research papers.

连词也可以用来使句子变得更长,比如使用“and, or, for, but, so, however”等词汇来连接不同的内容。科学论文也可以用副词来连接不同的内容,比如“therefore, however, thus”。 与其纠结在语法上,我更愿意来谈谈这些词汇在长句中的正确使用和误用。在接下去讲之前,我们先来看看一句连写句。下面这个例子来自最近编辑的研究论文,但是为了去掉作者和课题信息,有些句子已经有所改动。

However, the methods used to collect specimens here had four disadvantages: first, the specimens were collected from local parks, so they were not representative of other disturbed habitats; second, the sample sizes were not large enough to provide representative plants of the species occurring in those parks, for example, the numbers of sample sedge specimens was very limited including only 14 specimens for all 30 sites represented; third, the amount of collection effort varied widely between sites, ranging from 11 to 156 specimens per site; fourth, the types of species were strongly biased toward woody species, with an obvious neglect of many hard-to-identify groups such as sedges mentioned above and an almost complete lack of bryophytes.

This type of sentence structure is often seen in scientific papers. It contains an initial statement followed by a series of ideas that are separated by commas. This can often be used effectively, but many authors try to stuff too many ideas into such long sentences. In addition, authors sometimes add extra words and ideas that add little to the meaning of the sentence. In this case, this form of writing can still be used with fewer words, or the sentence can be broken into several sentences. The following example breaks the above sentence into parts but still contains the main ideas within the original sentence.


However, the methods used to collect specimens here had four disadvantages. First, because the specimens were collected only from local parks, they failed to represent other disturbed habitats. Second, the sample sizes were inadequate. For example, sedge collecting was very limited including, with only 14 specimens for all 30 sites represented. Third, the amount of collection effort varied too widely, ranging from 11 to 156 specimens per site. Fourth, woody species were over-represented while many hard-to-identify groups such as sedges and bryophytes were obviously under-represented.

What has changed? The number of words dropped from 117 to 85 without any loss in meaning. More importantly, long and wordy descriptions were eliminated. In particular, the second and fourth ideas were shortened markedly. Here is another long, run-on sentence followed by a shortened version.


Each site was divided into five plots, we chose five twigs from each of 20 trees that were between 10 to 15 years old in each plot and collected fully developed needles from branches near the tree crown and then needles were cut off and wrapped up use gauze while needles were collected around midday and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80°C until analysis.

That sentence definitely confuses the reader, starting by talking about five plots and ending in the freezer.  No wonder the reader gets lost. The sentence presents several ideas: 1) each site had five plots, 2) samples were collected from 20 trees in each plot, 3) twigs were collected from near the tree crown, 4) needle collection was described, and 5) needle storage was described.

这句话肯定会使读者感到迷惑。以五块地开头,然后结尾时变成了冰箱,也就难怪读者会迷糊了。这句话表述了这么几个意思: 1)每个站点都有五块地,2)样本是从每块地中的20棵树上收集的,3)从靠近树冠的地方收集树枝,4)针叶收集方法的描述,5)针叶储存方法的描述。

What is wrong with this example sentence? The first comma separates independent sentences. It should be a period. Then, a long and complex process is described in one very long sentence. This should be broken into a series of logical steps. In this case, “first, second, and third” could be used for each step (as is done in an earlier example), or other words can join the steps as is shown in the following example.

这个句子有什么问题呢?第一个逗号分隔的是两个独立的句子,所以应该是用句号。然后是用一个很长的句子描述一个长而复杂的过程。这应该被分成一系列符合逻辑的步骤。在这种情况下“first, second, and third ”可以用于每个步骤(就如前一个例句),或者如下面的例句一样用一些其它词将这些步骤连接起来:

First, each site was divided into five plots. We chose five twigs from each of 20 trees that were between 10 to 15 years old in each plot. Then, fully developed needles were from branches near the tree crown. The needles were cut off and wrapped up use gauze. This was done around midday; needles were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80°C until analysis.

  Some journals will require that any sentence longer than three lines be broken into shorter sentences. While this extreme is not always necessary, any time a sentence is longer than three lines, the author should ask him or herself the following questions. Does this sentence try to join too many ideas? Can I use a semicolon to separate independent ideas? Have I used words that connect ideas, such as “therefore, in addition, perhaps, however?”

一些期刊会要求将任何长于三行的句子分成短些的句子。虽然这有些极端,不见得总是有必要,但是当一句话长于三行时,作者都应该问自己以下这几个问题。是否在一句话中添加了太多内容?是否可以用分号来分隔相对独立的内容?是否用了像“therefore, in addition, perhaps, however”这样的词来连接句子?

Lastly, I would like to end with a series of short examples of run-on sentences, each followed by a correct example and a few notes. The sentences describe themselves and provide examples.


错误:Incorrect: Use a conjunction to connect two sentences you will avoid creating a run-on sentence.

正确:Correct: Use a conjunction to connect two sentences and you will avoid creating a run-on sentence.


错误:Incorrect: For a series of ideas use a semicolon and number the ideas this can be done by using a series of steps and use “and” before the last number.

正确:Correct: Several ideas follow: 1) a semicolon introduces a series of ideas, 2) numbers are added for emphasis, 3) ideas are presented using a series of steps, 4) each idea is numbered, and 5) the word “and” is added before the last number.


错误:Incorrect: Use a semicolon to separate distinct ideas (independent clauses) this allows you to avoid having a run-on sentence.

正确:Correct: Use a semicolon to separate distinct ideas (independent clauses); this allows you to avoid having a run-on sentence.


错误:Incorrect: Avoid long and complex sentences that join too many ideas because this will confuse the writer and it will also make your ideas very hard to follow because you are trying to say too much in a single sentence and your reader will end up very confused especially if you repeatedly use the word “and” so that the whole idea gets lost as does your reader.

正确: Correct: Avoid long and complex sentences that join too many ideas because this will confuse the writer. It will also make your ideas very hard to follow because you are trying to say too much in a single sentence. Your reader will end up very confused especially if you repeatedly use “and.” The whole idea gets lost as does your reader.


Few writers use sentences that are too short. Much more commonly, long sentences connect too many ideas with the result that the reader loses their way and becomes confused. A writer should assume the reader will easily become confused. It is better to make the mistake of writing sentences that are too simple rather than ones that are long, complex, and confusing.


As while all writing, editing is important. Re-reading your own writing, especially if you read it to someone else, will always help you catch errors. The author of this article once had someone bring a copy of something he had written to him. My co-worker asked, “What does this sentence mean?”


I read the sentence, then I responded, “I know two things. First, I wrote it. Second, I have no idea what it means!”

我读了那句话,然后回答说:“我只知道: 第一,这句话是我写的;第二,我完全不知道它是什么意思!”






  • 这是我第一次提交初稿给LetPub帮忙英语润色。令我惊讶的是,2天后就得到了回复。还有,这篇论文很快被接收了。非常感谢你们的服务,后面肯定还有机会和你们合作的。因为我最近还在赶另外一篇。

    - 王博士,上海交通大学附属瑞金医院

  • 前天收到你们发给我的论文修改稿,我非常满意。 无论从评阅意见,价格,还是回复问题的耐心程度和效率方面,都给我留下了很深的印象。真的非常感谢,我会向推荐周围的同事推荐LetPub的服务。

    - 梁博士, 中国科学院研究生院

  • 在知道LetPub之前,我也找了较多国外公司的论文修改服务,但由于 地域上的差异,沟通不太方便。而且,国外公司的发票我们不认可。 幸好院里另外一个主任向我推荐你们在上海的公司,发现你们的客户顾问很专业,办事效率也高。还令我高兴的是,你们上海公司开的正规发票我们单位报销完全没问题。真是太好了!

    - 胡博士,复旦大学

  • 我最近让你们帮忙修改的两篇文章,一篇已经被“CANCER BIOL THER”接收,目前还在等另外一篇的消息。我觉得你们的服务对我帮助蛮大,提出的修改意见也很有建设性。

    - 孙主任,中南大学湘雅二医院

  • 我非常乐意向推荐科研工作者使用LetPub的服务,因为如果我们大多数时间浪费在修改语法错误及调整语言表达方式的话,很不值得。LetPub让我有更多的时间关注科研的创新性,把握我的课题方向。

    - 郑博士,南京理工大学

  • 我是一名将要毕业的博士生,由于实验结果出来得较晚,加上选择投稿的杂志评审周期较长,我不得不时刻和时间赛跑。LetPub的高效服务为我节省了不少时间,谢谢你们!

    - 张博士,中国科学院金属研究所

  • 根据杂志评审编辑的反馈意见,我的文章最好请一位英语为母语的专业人士进行润色一下。 通过同事的推荐,LetPub为我很好的解决了这个问题,后来评审编辑也称赞语言写作上有了显著的提升。非常感谢!

    - 欧阳博士,中山大学

  • 我对你们出色的服务质量印象非常深刻,我也中受到了一些启发,相信会对我今后的写作提升有帮助。我的上一篇文章已经被知名的医学期刊接收,今后会推荐更多的同事来寻求贵公司的帮助。

    - 刘博士,浙江大学

  • 对于学术文章来说,优秀的英语写作非常重要。但对于非英语为母语的科研工作者来说,这点的难度也较大。我非常信赖LetPub专业的编辑及校对团队,我已经提交了数篇初稿,每次都能快速收到高质量的修改。

    - 严博士,南京大学

  • 我以前找过一些其它公司的编辑服务,但期刊编辑的评审意见中依然有要求再次进行语言文字的修改和校对。自从和LetPub合作后,这些问题再也没有出现过。我非常乐意推荐你们的服务给周围的同事们。

    - 张博士,华南师范大学

联系我们 | 站点地图 | 友情链接 | 授权代理商 | 人才招聘

© 2010-2018 中国: LetPub上海分公司 沪ICP备10217908号

United States: Tel: 1-781-202-9968 Address: 204 2nd Ave, Fl 1, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451