C Schmoor, C Gall, S Stampf… - Biometrical Journal, 2011 - Wiley Online Library 1 Clinical Trials Unit, University Medical Center Freiburg, Elsa®sser Str. 2, 79110 Freiburg, Germany 2 Institute of Medical Biometry and Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Freiburg, Stefan-Meier-Str. 26, 79104 Freiburg, Germany ... Received 29 July 2010, revised 21 ... Cited by 1 - Related articles - All 3 versions
D Westreich, SR Cole, MJ Funk… - … and drug safety, 2011 - Wiley Online Library ... The use of propensity scores to reduce confoundingbias in non-experimental studies has increased dramatically1 since their introduction by Rosenbaum and Rubin.2 The propensity score is the predicted probability of treatment (alternatively, exposure) conditional on selected ... Cited by 1 - Related articles - All 3 versions
[PDF] from ucla.eduE Bareinboim… - 2011 - cs.ucla.edu ... (a,b) Simplest examples of selection and confoundingbias, respectively. (c) Typical study with intermediary variable W between X and selection. ... Op- erationally, confoundingbias can be eliminated by ran- domization – selection bias cannot. ... Cited by 4 - Related articles - View as HTML - All 2 versions
AR Kristal… - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, 2011 - AACR ... This prioritization scheme is designed to favor the publication of studies in which confounding, bias, and measurement errors are minimized. ... These trials are unique in that they are least likely to be subject to confounding, bias, and measurement errors. ... All 2 versions
[PDF] from utas.edu.auS Simpson, F Pittas, I van der Mei… - Journal of Neurology, …, 2011 - jnnp.bmj.com ... The prevalence data reported for the Hammond study are standardised to the 1981 Australian population and are not strictly comparable—to assess possible confoundingbias, we performed a sensitivity analysis over the time points 1981, 2001 and 2009 by standardising the ... Cited by 2 - Related articles - All 4 versions