[HTML] from jcojournal.orgF Lécuru, P Mathevet, D Querleu… - Journal of Clinical …, 2011 - jcojournal.org ... 24,25. The false-negativerate was 8.0% (2 of 25 patients) in our study overall and 0% among the 104 patients with bilaterally detected SLNs. ... 9,14,20,22 In our study, the low false-negative rate precluded an evaluation of risk factors for false-negative results. ... Cited by 5 - Related articles - All 7 versions
H Shen… - Journal of Water Resources Planning and …, 2011 - link.aip.org ... nodes (PINs). PINs identification has two major issues, the falsenegativerate (failure to identify the true ingress location), and the false positive issue (falsely identifying a location which is not the true ingress location). A data ...
J Ioannidis, R Tarone… - Epidemiology, 2011 - journals.lww.com ... 1,2,6,27–29 Because of the same sources of bias, the false-negativerate determined from published results is usually less than the false-negativerate predicted by power considerations alone; when the main analysis is not nominally significant, some investigators may ... Cited by 4 - Related articles - All 4 versions
[PDF] from umc.edu.dzJ Seebacher… - Cell, 2011 - umc.edu.dz ... deduced: (1) the false positive rate (FPR, background) is the fraction of identified interactions that are in the negative set; (2) the true positive rate (TPR, or accuracy) is the fraction of identified, genuine interacting protein pairs: TPR = 1 - FPR; (3) the falsenegativerate (FNR) is ... Cited by 3 - Related articles - View as HTML - All 4 versions
G Cserni, R Bori… - Journal of clinical pathology, 2011 - jcp.bmj.com ... in our preliminary work and quoted at the end of the introduction,9 only one out of 762 cases would have been falsely classified as node-negative, which would mean 99.9% accuracy and a 0.3% false-negativerate (one false-negative case per 369 node-positive cases). ... Related articles - All 4 versions